The Rasmussen polling group released a poll yesterday in
the Texas Republican governor’s race showing Rick Perry at 43%, Kay Bailey
Hutchison at 33%, and Debra Medina at 12%, with 12% undecided or refusing to
state a preference. Based on her
double-digit support, the Belo Corporation has decided to include the Wharton County activist in their televised
debate at the end of the month. In the
only other public poll I have seen that included Ms. Medina, she had 7% support
back in December, so it seems she is moving up.
This is not surprising as several developments are combining to make her
a serious factor in the March 2nd primary.
First, the national mood among Republicans and Independents
clearly favors anti-establishment candidacies as we see in Massachusetts today with the rise of GOP
senate nominee Scott Brown in his race with Democratic Attorney General Martha
Coakley. Coakley represents the governing
party – Brown is the outsider. Transfer
that national trend to Texas
and who does it benefit? Not the 17-year
U.S.
senator, or the nine-year governor, both of whom have been in elective political
positions most of their adult lives.
No, a Tea Party activist who worked in Ron Paul’s 2008 presidential race
can corner this segment of the electorate much more easily than her
better-known opponents.
Second, Ms. Medina had a good debate last week in Denton. She kept her answers short and on point, and
projected a calm, consistent message that resonated with folks opposed to
abortion, for gun and property rights, and opposed to the state tax
system. Governor Perry and Senator
Hutchison did not fare so well, partly because their bickering at each other enabled
Ms. Medina to occupy the high ground. It
will be interesting to see if the insurgent candidate can build on her solid
performance in the second, and final, televised debate.
Debra Medina is not, of course, anywhere near as well-known
as Rick Perry or Kay Bailey Hutchison, but her years of work within the
Republican Party give her credibility with party activists like precinct
committee members. These unpaid party
volunteers can be very helpful in a low-vote primary, as we seem likely to have
March 2nd. And because Ms.
Medina will get better known as the election approaches because of the debates
and other free media coverage, this gives her a good chance to grow her vote
base, especially among the undecided voters who know Perry and Hutchison well,
but have not yet decided to support either one.
Finally, a three-way party primary like the Republicans have
for governor on March 2nd is perfect for maximizing a “protest
vote.” Why? Because of the Texas rule that one must get 50% plus to win
the nomination. If voters are angry at
the party establishment and want to send a message, a vote for Ms. Medina is an
easy way to do so. From these voters’
perspective forcing Governor Perry and Senator Hutchison to settle things in an
April runoff might not be all bad. Making
them go one-on-one for another 30 days would give those folks not much enamored
with either front-runner an additional opportunity to size them up before
making a final commitment for the November nominee.
A Perry-Hutchison runoff would be good news for Democrat
Bill White, as it would consume millions of dollars in GOP campaign funds, and
likely leave the eventual winner in a weaker position to unite the party for
the General Election than would be the case if a clear winner emerges on March
2nd.
Dr. Richard Murray
** Transfer that national trend to Texas and who does it benefit? Not the 17-year U.S. senator, or the nine-year governor, both of whom have been in elective political positions most of their adult lives. **
Seriously?
Medina's at 12% in a Rasmussen poll.
That's even worse than perennial non-factor candidate Chris Bell usually fares in his races!
Come on now.
Posted by: Kevin Whited | January 19, 2010 at 08:12 PM
Medina's only problem is being unfairly ignored by the main stream media. She is not a household name but her message is spreading like wildfire. Its about time for Texans to stand up and fight for Texas. If we only supported canidates the polls and media said could win then why even vote. People please take the time to learn about the issues and vote on what you believe not on who your told can win.
Posted by: John Conaghan | January 19, 2010 at 08:57 PM
Finally, another choice besides Barbie (Hutchinson), Ken (Perry), Howdy Doody (White) and the Chi man (Shami)!
Posted by: Carol Mitchell | January 20, 2010 at 07:56 AM
Lets see, Fake prick #1 or Fake Prick #2?
One supports extremely high property taxes on land they supposedly own.
One supports stealing private property
One supports banker bailouts
Both support Abortion
Both support open borders
Debra Media as governor = Problem solved
Posted by: Jim Bob | January 21, 2010 at 01:38 AM